Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 01 '18 at 20:56
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 74.9
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 132
55% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 284
32% 250 Pts
64-Core 281
17% 281 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 57%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 397.31
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 73.3
Reflection 73.5
Parallax 70.4
60% 72.4 fps
MRender 69.1
Gravity 68.5
Splatting 68.4
56% 68.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$72
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 495
Write 318
Mixed 341
85% 385 MB/s
4K Read 33.9
4K Write 40.8
4K Mixed 21.3
100% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 92.1
DQ Mixed 52.9
60% 105 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 118%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40
132GB free
Firmware: CR10 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 60.9
Write 75.9
Mixed 74.1
53% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.29
4K Mixed 0.3
77% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 44%
ST1000LM 014-1EJ164 1TB
442GB free, PID 0569
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.2% Above average
Read 92.9
Write 91.3
Mixed 67.3
106% 83.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 5.76
4K Mixed 0.51
216% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
36.2% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.43 GB/s
Latency 90.5
44% 90.5 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 582 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $160
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $383
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback