Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics91.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 07:37
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 64.6
2-Core 119
52% 85.3 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 292
32% 255 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Asus(1043 869D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.6% Outstanding
Lighting 114
Reflection 108
Parallax 110
93% 111 fps
MRender 137
Gravity 102
Splatting 92.4
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 282 286 285 287 286 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 432
Mixed 365
SusWrite 296
87% 388 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 69.5
4K Mixed 47.1
155% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 259
194% 260 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
481GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 394 341 251 253 242 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
82.9% Excellent
Read 433
Write 441
Mixed 373
SusWrite 309
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 33.3
113% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 259
194% 258 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
39.5% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 13
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 11.7
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 96
42% 96 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $601
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback