Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C08
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)  (all builds)
Memory25 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201027
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 10 '23 at 01:51
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 83.1
1-Core 122
2-Core 246
83% 150 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 351
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 338
21% 338 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$349
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.1% Excellent
Lighting 86.6
Reflection 134
Parallax 166
71% 129 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 90.2
Splatting 158
122% 149 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 93%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,307
Write 843
Mixed 855
222% 1,002 MB/s
4K Read 53.7
4K Write 101
4K Mixed 68.3
222% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 786
DQ Write 576
DQ Mixed 252
305% 538 MB/s
Poor: 103% Great: 236%
Seagate One Touch HDD 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0004
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.3
Write 115
Mixed 66.2
69% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.3
99% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-U16G-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 25.3
MC Write 32.4
MC Mixed 25.1
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 32.4
SC Mixed 23.9
69% 24 GB/s
Latency 76.5
52% 76.5 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 26" 1280 720 BBY0050 NS-32D510NA19
Typical H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08) Builds (Compare 4,038 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-M2 PLUS (MS-7C08)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 140% - Outstanding Total price: $220
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $376WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $250Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback