Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB

Performance Results


Gaming 125% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 135% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	87% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

10 months ago, 10 months ago.

System	Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB
Memory	52 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191211
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 17 '23 at 15:18
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900X-$590 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 70.2 1-Core 123 2-Core 239 78% 144 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 900 81% 683 Pts	64-Core 1,509 93% 1,509 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Sapphire(174B A503) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 536.40 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	160% Outstanding	Lighting 215 Reflection 207 Parallax 238 175% 220 fps	MRender 270 Gravity 215 Splatting 170 173% 218 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB 5,348 User benchmarks, average bench 265% 170GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 898 880 864 889 849 656 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	87% Excellent	Read 466 Write 129 Mixed 152 SusWrite 840 89% 397 MB/s	4K Read 2.7 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 2.4 12% 4.57 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 245 DQ Mixed 379 264% 334 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 421%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB 5,348 User benchmarks, average bench 265% 539GB free Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 905 881 843 886 860 999 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 321 Write 466 Mixed 151 SusWrite 896 104% 458 MB/s	4K Read 5.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 2.3 12% 3.27 MB/s
Poor: 134% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 421%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 180GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1484 1522 1338 1463 1304 1395 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 229 Write 163 Mixed 175 SusWrite 1,418 114% 496 MB/s	4K Read 7.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.5 16% 4.27 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 372%
Amd-raid ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB 400 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 3TB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 127 113 143 137 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	67.7% Good	Read 102 Write 87.8 Mixed 75 SusWrite 132 73% 99.3 MB/s	4K Read 6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.6 339% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 146%
Seagate ST20000NM007D-3D 20TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 8.5TB free Firmware: SN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 215 217 197 224 219 225 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	94.9% Outstanding	Read 114 Write 29.9 Mixed 15.9 SusWrite 216 68% 93.9 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.5 295% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 94.9% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 64GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2666, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 45.5 MC Mixed 28.1 95% 33.4 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 10.5 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 101 40% 101 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	64	46	60	27"	2560 1440	ENC3069 CS2731

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO9-900_RGB Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 131%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 143%

UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB

CPU
Core i9-9900XIntel $590Bench 84%, 3,521 samples	52x
Core i7-9800XIntel $545Bench 83%, 4,003 samples	6x
Core i9-9980XEIntel $1,097Bench 83%, 2,201 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	55x
RTX 2080Nvidia $385Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	3x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	3x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
Samsung SSD 980 500GBNvmeBench 226%, 1,856 samples	8x

RAM
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 64GBKingstonBench 85%, 37 samples	42x
ACR26D4U9D8ME-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 83%, 184 samples	7x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 4x8GBKingstonBench 90%, 118 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,126

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16