Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 120%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics161% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PO9-900_RGB  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Predator PO9-900_RGB
Memory48.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191211
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 08 '23 at 16:09
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$590
CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 64.5
1-Core 119
2-Core 239
76% 141 Pts
4-Core 453
8-Core 802
76% 627 Pts
64-Core 1,612
100% 1,612 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Sapphire(174B A503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (70th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
161% Outstanding
Lighting 216
Reflection 209
Parallax 239
176% 221 fps
MRender 272
Gravity 216
Splatting 176
176% 221 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 161%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
66GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,147
Write 1,619
Mixed 601
320% 1,456 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 40.7
142% 48.3 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 431
318% 418 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 500GB
267GB free
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1590 1189 274 281 287 274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,520
Write 1,690
Mixed 1583
SusWrite 649
306% 1,360 MB/s
4K Read 45.2
4K Write 78.2
4K Mixed 54.3
180% 59.2 MB/s
DQ Read 505
DQ Write 412
DQ Mixed 462
345% 460 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 177%
Great: 354%
Amd-raid ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB
42GB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 182 182 183 175 183 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86.8% Excellent
Read 116
Write 116
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 180
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 1.1
872% 7.7 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 146%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
568GB free
Firmware: MX6OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 170 170 170 166 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 171
Write 170
Mixed 42.2
SusWrite 169
100% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
162% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 64GB
2666, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
82% Excellent
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 44.4
MC Mixed 27.6
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 8.6
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 82%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PO9-900_RGB Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 143%
UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,126
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $139Nvidia RTX 4070 $515Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback