Performance Results

Gaming 101%
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive372% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 22 '22 at 20:56
Run Duration217 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 283
92% 170 Pts
4-Core 525
8-Core 903
87% 714 Pts
64-Core 1,110
69% 1,110 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8681) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
107% Outstanding
Lighting 130
Reflection 179
Parallax 138
106% 149 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 131
Splatting 110
113% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 107%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
41GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 31 107 45 26 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 322
Write 220
Mixed 216
SusWrite 72.9
46% 208 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 29.2
118% 45 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 215
DQ Mixed 120
118% 188 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 100%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$147
573GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2406 2413 2386 1197 833 836 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
372% Outstanding
Read 2,573
Write 2,409
Mixed 2,334
SusWrite 1,679
506% 2,249 MB/s
4K Read 77.4
4K Write 169
4K Mixed 105
341% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,492
DQ Write 1201
DQ Mixed 1,299
985% 1,331 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 372%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$40
280GB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 156 141 118 126 155 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 143
Write 109
Mixed 85.7
SusWrite 141
88% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GD3200C16K2E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CM4X8GD3200C16K2E CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.7
MC Write 24
MC Mixed 38.1
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 26.8
SC Write 21.8
SC Mixed 37.7
82% 28.8 GB/s
Latency 75.2
53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,649 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 143%
Desktop 103%
Workstation 130%

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $707
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback