Asus WS X299 SAGE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0%
Desktop 0%
Workstation 0%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus WS X299 SAGE  (all builds)
Memory56.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20210924
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateApr 02 '22 at 21:40
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900X-$620
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 89.8
1-Core 138
2-Core 276
92% 168 Pts
4-Core 552
8-Core 1,034
95% 793 Pts
64-Core 1,853
115% 1,853 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 473.04
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
Lighting 182
Reflection 194
Parallax 186
148% 187 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 187
Splatting 126
121% 150 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 131%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,791
Write 102
Mixed 197
354% 1,696 MB/s
4K Read 1,090
4K Write 6.1
4K Mixed 12.1
1,671% 370 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$67
262GB free
Firmware: CC41
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 135
Write 118
Mixed 28.3
68% 94 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
349% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 110%
WD WD102KFBX-68M95N0 10TB
321GB free
Firmware: 83.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,828
Write 86.8
Mixed 116
1,202% 1,677 MB/s
4K Read 1,104
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 6.7
46,798% 371 MB/s
Poor: 79% Great: 140%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 4000 C19 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
128% Outstanding
MC Read 47.1
MC Write 64.2
MC Mixed 44.9
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 11.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 128%
Great: 128%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical WS X299 SAGE Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 132%
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation 166%

Motherboard: Asus WS X299 SAGE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $1,549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $133
Intel Core i5-13600K $232Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $77
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback