Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB

Performance Results


Gaming 130% UFO	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 139% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	82.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB
Memory	49.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farver
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20191211
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '23 at 15:44
Run Duration	189 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900X-$590 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 84% CPU0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Memory 71 1-Core 119 2-Core 245 78% 145 Pts	4-Core 494 8-Core 921 84% 707 Pts	64-Core 1,542 95% 1,542 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 96%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Sapphire(174B A503) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 535.98 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	160% Outstanding	Lighting 214 Reflection 208 Parallax 258 174% 227 fps	MRender 273 Gravity 215 Splatting 176 176% 221 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 160% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 500GB 1,856 User benchmarks, average bench 226% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 744 773 655 879 1063 1042 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	82.3% Excellent	Read 626 Write 140 Mixed 152 SusWrite 859 99% 444 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 6.4 4K Mixed 3.6 16% 5.13 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 82.3% Great: 354%
Samsung 970 EVO Plus 500GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 401GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 28 33 34 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	25.5% Poor	Read 500 Write 2 Mixed 14.7 SusWrite 31.2 29% 137 MB/s	4K Read 9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 3 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 89%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 500GB 1,856 User benchmarks, average bench 226% 253GB free Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 662 665 596 485 162 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	49.3% Average	Read 447 Write 744 Mixed 178 SusWrite 452 103% 455 MB/s	4K Read 5.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 2.7 13% 3.5 MB/s
Poor: 125% ↑ This bench: 49.3% Great: 354%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 1TB 258 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 17GB free Firmware: 1.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 286 273 235 288 337 335 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 104 Write 250 Mixed 80.7 SusWrite 292 42% 182 MB/s	4K Read 8.5 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 4.8 20% 5.27 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 89%
Realtek RTL9210B NVME 1TB 43 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 363GB free Firmware: 1.00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 336 288 336 364 360 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36% Below average	Read 160 Write 107 Mixed 120 SusWrite 338 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 7.3 4K Mixed 14.2 25% 7.9 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 120%
Amd-raid ST16000NM001G-2K 16TB 400 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 241GB free Firmware: SN02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 125 116 124 133 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 92.7 Write 74.7 Mixed 66.1 SusWrite 125 66% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 1.2 373% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 146%
Seagate ST20000NM007D-3D 20TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 449GB free Firmware: SN01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 122 121 127 130 130 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	66.1% Good	Read 104 Write 72.7 Mixed 56.9 SusWrite 125 66% 89.9 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.1 101% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 66.1% Great: 95%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 64GB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2666, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2133, 2666, 2133, 2666 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	85.3% Excellent	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 45.9 MC Mixed 27.9 97% 33.9 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 21.2 SC Mixed 9.8 36% 12.5 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 87%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator PO9-900_RGB Builds (Compare 61 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 131%

UFO

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 143%

UFO

System: Acer Predator PO9-900_RGB

CPU
Core i9-9900XIntel $590Bench 84%, 3,521 samples	52x
Core i7-9800XIntel $545Bench 83%, 4,003 samples	6x
Core i9-9980XEIntel $1,097Bench 83%, 2,201 samples	3x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	55x
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	3x
RTX 3080Nvidia $600Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	3x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $97Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	10x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	9x
Samsung SSD 980 500GBNvmeBench 226%, 1,856 samples	8x

RAM
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 Corsair CMW32GX4M4A2666C16 ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 64GBKingstonBench 85%, 37 samples	42x
ACR26D4U9D8ME-16 2x16GBKingstonBench 83%, 184 samples	7x
ACR26D4U9S8ME-8 4x8GBKingstonBench 90%, 118 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $1,128

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16