Today's hottest deals

Acer Aspire E5-475G

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics9.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAcer Aspire E5-475G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer AntMan_SK
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMay 24 '23 at 04:45
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.4% Above average
Memory 69.4
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 136
55% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 183
8-Core 190
25% 186 Pts
64-Core 195
12% 195 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 940MX
Acer(1025 110F) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.3179
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
9.56% Terrible
Lighting 12
Reflection 10.1
Parallax 12.9
10% 11.7 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 13.4
Splatting 8.9
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.56%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
667GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 54 61 60 58 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
34.4% Below average
Read 60.4
Write 118
Mixed 56.7
SusWrite 58.8
54% 73.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
152% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 71%
ST1000LM 049-2GH172 1TB
226GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 129 122 124 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 94.2
Write 139
Mixed 84.6
SusWrite 124
156% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.4
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
63.7% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.1
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 25.3
SC Mixed 19.9
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire E5-475G Builds (Compare 608 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire E5-475G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 23% - Poor Total price: $25
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback