Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 81FV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive70% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81FV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory0.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181102
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '19 at 15:58
Run Duration186 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 57.5
1-Core 124
2-Core 247
75% 143 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 771
76% 621 Pts
64-Core 976
60% 976 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Legend(17AA 39FD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6292
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.61% Terrible
Lighting 7.3
Reflection 34.3
Parallax 7.31
6% 16.3 fps
MRender 6.14
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 14.7
8% 8.91 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.61%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 252 205 227 74 61 65 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
70% Good
Read 359
Write 271
Mixed 251
SusWrite 147
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 21.8
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 29.6
112% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 290
DQ Write 259
DQ Mixed 158
150% 236 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 70%
Great: 113%
TOSHIBA MK5059GSXP 500GB
201GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 37 37 36 36 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Read 30.8
Write 31.5
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 36
41% 30.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
56% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 29%
SAMSUNG HN-M101MBB 1TB
95GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.8 4.7 4.6 4.7 4.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
7.53% Terrible
Read 27.7
Write 12
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 4.5
20% 16.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
45% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.53%
Great: 22%
ST2000LM 003 HN-M201RAD 2TB
133GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 29.5
Write 31.2
Mixed 25.7
37% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 42%
ST1000LM 049-2GH172 1TB
172GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.1 0 0 0 0.1 3.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Read 10.3
Write 13.5
Mixed 10.2
SusWrite 0.7
12% 8.68 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
7% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MD78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.1% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 12.3
MC Mixed 10.2
35% 12.2 GB/s
SC Read 7
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 135
30% 135 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81FV Builds (Compare 4,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81FV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback