Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z270-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics43.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270-A  (all builds)
Memory44.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20171225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 22 '23 at 16:15
Run Duration398 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7500-$83
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 369
8-Core 351
49% 360 Pts
64-Core 328
20% 328 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-2048SP
AMD(1002 0B31) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1286 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing below potential (75th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.3% Average
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 59.8
Parallax 73.9
43% 62.1 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60.6
Splatting 44.7
44% 55.1 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 47%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tecmiyo SATA SSD 480GB
398GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 704D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 235 324 332 364 396 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 431
Write 376
Mixed 352
SusWrite 323
83% 371 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 9.3
77% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 125
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 14.5
51% 109 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 75%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
223GB free
Firmware: 71B1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 51 51 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 414
Write 342
Mixed 310
SusWrite 75.1
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 66.9
4K Mixed 25.8
108% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 155
137% 204 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 100%
Tecmiyo SATA SSD 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 704D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 365 350 373 366 387 408 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Read 447
Write 358
Mixed 333
SusWrite 375
85% 378 MB/s
4K Read 26.7
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 11
92% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 14.9
59% 129 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 75%
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: V0513A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1101 905 1004 1079 1101 1005 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,327
Write 1,094
Mixed 926
SusWrite 1,032
246% 1,095 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 28.8
154% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 428
DQ Write 267
DQ Mixed 400
284% 365 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 177%
Great: 230%
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$44
74GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 71 69 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 67.3
Mixed 49.9
SusWrite 68.9
47% 63.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 49%
Seagate ST3750640AS 750GB-$60
670GB free
Firmware: 3.AFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 72 73 71 71 73 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 64.3
Write 67.9
Mixed 43.7
SusWrite 71.8
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 42%
Hitachi HDS721025CLA382 250GB-$261
126GB free
Firmware: JP1OA3GH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 113 114 115 118 117 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 118
Write 105
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 115
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$37
466GB free
Firmware: HP63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 126 127 126 129 130 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Read 112
Write 67.1
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 127
69% 93.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
179% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 70%
ST350031 2CS 500GB
464GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 101 102 105 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 49.5
SusWrite 102
121% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 43%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5.7 3.1 3.6 1.8 1.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 161
Write 166
Mixed 40.5
SusWrite 3.3
111% 92.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 59%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
2TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 98 101 102 105 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 111
Write 122
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 102
123% 93 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 59%
HGST HDS 724040ALE640 4TB
987GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 5.7 3.1 3.6 1.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
22% Poor
Read 103
Write 102
Mixed 25.4
SusWrite 3.2
70% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
95% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 22%
Great: 59%
WDC WD80 EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
2.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.9 4.2 2.1 2.6 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26.4% Poor
Read 112
Write 109
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 2.6
93% 74.2 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
153% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 32%
WDC WD80 EAZZ-00BKLB0 8TB
3.5TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.5 2.4 1.2 1.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
Read 112
Write 108
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 1.3
89% 72 MB/s
4K Read 3.4
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
166% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 32%
SAMSUNG HD105SI 1TB
931GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 76 78 79 82 83 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.7% Below average
Read 98.3
Write 92.8
Mixed 57.5
SusWrite 78.9
108% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
107% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA100 1TB
622GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 77 77 81 82 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 117
Write 119
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 77.5
113% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.6
88% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Adata DDR4 3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 Adata DDR4 3200 48GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.7% Excellent
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 35.1
MC Mixed 29.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 35.6
SC Mixed 23.7
72% 25.4 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270-A Builds (Compare 8,781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270-A - $159

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $728
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $270WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback