Today's hottest deals

Hp-pavilion KN429AA-ABZ a6347.it

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
SystemHp-pavilion KN429AA-ABZ a6347.it  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK Berkeley
Memory4.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20071024
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '21 at 03:12
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Memory 68
1-Core 18.5
2-Core 37.2
31% 41.2 Pts
4-Core 71.1
8-Core 72.3
10% 71.7 Pts
64-Core 74.6
5% 74.6 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 80GB (2007)-$44
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 02.03A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 87 81 83 82 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 88.1
Write 87.3
Mixed 56
SusWrite 83.7
58% 78.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
183% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 49%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 8GB-$7
4GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 5.7 5.8 4.2 4.2 4.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Read 32.8
Write 4.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.7
11% 11.5 MB/s
4K Read 5.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
21% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x2GB
3 of 4 slots used
6GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 3.6
MC Mixed 4
12% 4.3 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.3
12% 4.33 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical KN429AA-ABZ a6347.it Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Hp-pavilion KN429AA-ABZ a6347.it

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $80
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback