Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (82%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210107
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMar 29 '22 at 20:47
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 82%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.2% Good
Memory 65.2
1-Core 84.7
2-Core 126
55% 92 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 390
46% 354 Pts
64-Core 388
24% 388 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 460-$75
CLim: 1212 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.2.3
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.2
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 26.4
17% 19.3 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 23.5
Splatting 24.1
20% 24.6 fps
Poor: 17%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 22%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X04c12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 126
Write 117
Mixed 132
28% 125 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 20.1
4K Mixed 4.7
24% 9.83 MB/s
DQ Read 53.2
DQ Write 75.1
DQ Mixed 115
73% 81.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GKE800UD102408-2400 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 13.7
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 10.1
34% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 5.1
13% 4.5 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H Builds (Compare 1,851 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $224
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback