Acer Predator PH317-52

Performance Results

Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 76%
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive180% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Predator PH317-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Sienna_CFS
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190327
Uptime7.2 Days
Run DateNov 18 '22 at 19:44
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 115
2-Core 212
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 388
8-Core 521
58% 454 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1266) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.13% Terrible
Lighting 5.3
Reflection 73.1
Parallax 5.9
4% 28.1 fps
MRender 10.6
Gravity 5
Splatting 0.3
4% 5.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.13%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$49
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 006C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 474 274 279 283 285 285 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
180% Outstanding
Read 2,006
Write 1,106
Mixed 1,077
SusWrite 314
249% 1,126 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Write 77.3
4K Mixed 54.7
179% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 662
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 146
224% 428 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 180%
Great: 157%
166GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 67 69 68 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 71
Write 82.2
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 68.6
50% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.5
147% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S8ME-8 Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.2% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 26.2
MC Mixed 20.4
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 28.1
SC Mixed 21.4
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Predator PH317-52 Builds (Compare 1,579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH317-52

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $374WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $417
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback