Gigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8

Performance Results

Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop 57%
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive169% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190816
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJan 07 '23 at 15:41
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Memory 73.1
1-Core 61.7
2-Core 113
51% 82.6 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 388
38% 309 Pts
64-Core 446
28% 446 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 1653) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver.
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.23% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 97.4
Parallax 7.4
6% 37.2 fps
MRender 9.7
Gravity 6.8
Splatting 10.7
8% 9.07 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.23%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$60
346GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1028 876 878 863 889 892 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
169% Outstanding
Read 1,588
Write 1,313
Mixed 1,133
SusWrite 904
277% 1,235 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 36
116% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 330
244% 323 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 169%
Great: 372%
282GB free
Firmware: CS303321
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1315 963 986 760 732 756 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
148% Outstanding
Read 1,079
Write 1,575
Mixed 1,281
SusWrite 919
275% 1,214 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 45.3
4K Mixed 33.8
108% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 406
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 349
258% 342 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 148%
Great: 286%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2666 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 18.8
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 15XV8 Builds (Compare 397 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 45%
Desktop 78%
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15XV8

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $378WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback