Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics51.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140106
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 18:40
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
47.8% Average
Memory 64.3
1-Core 57.2
2-Core 115
47% 78.8 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 209
25% 194 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1531 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.1% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 61.9
52% 65.1 fps
MRender 66.1
Gravity 63.4
Splatting 55.1
50% 61.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M500 120GB-$75
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 52 68 78 87 89 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.7% Poor
Read 265
Write 90.4
Mixed 121
SusWrite 69.5
30% 136 MB/s
4K Read 12.5
4K Write 12.9
4K Mixed 5
32% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 73.6
DQ Write 43.3
DQ Mixed 45.3
37% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 26.7%
Great: 77%
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
247GB free
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 219 275 299 327 334 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
52% Above average
Read 163
Write 97.1
Mixed 196
SusWrite 270
41% 181 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 31.6
4K Mixed 18.6
64% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 199
DQ Write 210
DQ Mixed 160
132% 190 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 102%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$53
811GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 101 101 104 107 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.9% Good
Read 121
Write 129
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 105
80% 108 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CML8GX3M2A1600C9 DDR3-1600 CL9 4GB CML8GX3M2A1600C9 DDR3-1600 CL9 4GB 16GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 8.3
SC Mixed 8
23% 7.9 GB/s
Latency 116
35% 116 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,889 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback