Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409BA_M409BA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive117% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409BA_M409BA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X409BA
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 17 '20 at 06:53
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
31.9% Below average
Memory 51.8
1-Core 48.9
2-Core 65.3
36% 55.3 Pts
4-Core 71.1
8-Core 76.6
10% 73.8 Pts
64-Core 89.2
6% 89.2 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Asus(1043 1C11) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.28
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.01% Terrible
Lighting 1.07
Reflection 2.42
Parallax 1.38
1% 1.62 fps
MRender 1.67
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 1.91
1% 1.54 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.01%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1202 256GB
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20200000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 401 403 413 417 422 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
117% Outstanding
Read 1,074
Write 658
Mixed 607
SusWrite 408
153% 687 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 52.8
4K Mixed 41.4
119% 39.7 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 245
185% 248 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 117%
Great: 189%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.8
MC Write 7.2
MC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.53 GB/s
SC Read 5.2
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 6.9
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 154
26% 154 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409BA_M409BA Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X409BA_M409BA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback