| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 40.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | CMS 7200-5571A (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK PRIME H310M-A R2.0 |
| Memory | 8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 11 |
| BIOS Date | 20200227 |
| Uptime | 0.3 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 24 '22 at 18:40 |
| Run Duration | 131 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 18% |
PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
70.6%
Very good
|
83% 148 Pts
|
45% 364 Pts
|
18% 288 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
40.4%
Average
|
43% 49.1 fps
|
35% 42.8 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvme Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$45
42GB free
Firmware: RKT303.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 617 426 510 570 490 401 MB/s
|
138%
Outstanding
|
133% 590 MB/s
|
169% 59.9 MB/s
|
516% 683 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
351GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 59 41 84 78 120 MB/s
|
70.9%
Very good
|
80% 109 MB/s
|
115% 0.87 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FJ CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
62.7%
Good
|
65% 22.9 GB/s
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
58% 68.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 7200-5571A Builds (Compare 219 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: CMS 7200-5571A
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-9100FIntel $135Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 184x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 11x |
| Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples | 10x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 126x |
| GeForce GTX 1650NvidiaBench 47%, 22,284 samples | 39x |
| GTX 1660-TiNvidia $143Bench 76%, 318,562 samples | 8x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $335 |