Today's hottest deals

Foxconn A9DA-S

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics31.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardFoxconn A9DA-S  (all builds)
Memory5.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100525
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 03 '22 at 16:45
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X2 555
Socket 938, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
30.2% Below average
Memory 45.6
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 83.2
34% 57.4 Pts
4-Core 89.7
8-Core 77.8
12% 83.8 Pts
64-Core 79.8
5% 79.8 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (46th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31.9% Below average
Lighting 40.2
Reflection 65.2
Parallax 40.2
33% 48.5 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 36.1
30% 37.1 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 120GB 120GB
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R5903
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 221
Write 240
Mixed 153
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 28.6
78% 25.5 MB/s
DQ Read 27
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 35.7
30% 42.9 MB/s
Poor: 36% Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
300GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 119 118 116 119 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
62.1% Good
Read 99.5
Write 97.8
Mixed 50.9
SusWrite 117
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 62.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
19.3% Very poor
MC Read 7.7
MC Write 5.7
MC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.67 GB/s
SC Read 5.7
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.3
16% 5.43 GB/s
Latency 178
22% 178 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.3%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A9DA-S Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn A9DA-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $175
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback