Today's hottest deals

Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock H410M-HVS R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime152 Days
Run DateSep 21 '22 at 13:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6405
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.6% Very good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 122
2-Core 211
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 331
8-Core 340
45% 336 Pts
64-Core 318
20% 318 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 610
ASRock(1849 9BA8) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
2.6% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.33 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 3.2
Splatting 5.5
3% 3 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.6%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Midasforce 120GB 120GB
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ZD0R024E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 318 381 401 260 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
88.2% Excellent
Read 380
Write 406
Mixed 316
SusWrite 320
80% 356 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 36.2
146% 57.3 MB/s
DQ Read 80.2
DQ Write 314
DQ Mixed 135
122% 176 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 88.2%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500414CS 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: CA14
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 106 108 107 110 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 103
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 107
67% 91.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS832A.M8FR 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 11.7
40% 14.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H410M-HVS R2.0 Builds (Compare 243 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock H410M-HVS R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback