Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-A  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190912
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 28 '22 at 18:54
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
72% 130 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 641
64% 521 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$120
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 30.0.21020.2
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 69
Reflection 64.8
Parallax 92.1
56% 75.3 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 78.4
Splatting 49.1
51% 64.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$30
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 120 62 53 57 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
44.3% Average
Read 296
Write 259
Mixed 164
SusWrite 73.6
44% 198 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 33.4
4K Mixed 22.1
64% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 252
DQ Write 86.9
DQ Mixed 111
97% 150 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 44.3%
Great: 82%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
205GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 62 63 62 62 62 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 78.9
Write 65.1
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 62.6
83% 63.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
92% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
85.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 29
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 24.3
70% 24.5 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-A Builds (Compare 568 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback