Today's hottest deals

Biostar H310MHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H310MHP  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190531
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateAug 18 '22 at 12:41
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
79.4% Very good
Memory 80.6
1-Core 119
2-Core 214
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 354
58% 412 Pts
64-Core 458
28% 458 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4
3% 3.93 fps
MRender 3.7
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 0.1
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RY23V0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 29 32 33 34 33 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 371
Write 129
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 40.9
30% 140 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 5.7
50% 13.7 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 7.6
18% 38.7 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 10.1
32% 11.4 GB/s
SC Read 10.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 6.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H310MHP Builds (Compare 1,081 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Biostar H310MHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $265
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback