Today's hottest deals

Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics50.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock FM2A88X+ Killer  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 23:58
Run Duration257 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 60.4
1-Core 62.6
2-Core 114
47% 79 Pts
4-Core 172
8-Core 165
23% 168 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
50.9% Above average
Lighting 66.3
Reflection 73.4
Parallax 84.2
54% 74.6 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 60
Splatting 44.7
45% 56.3 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin ECO2 240GB-$109
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 609ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 132 146 130 134 148 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
62.5% Good
Read 302
Write 243
Mixed 229
SusWrite 146
52% 230 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 29.5
107% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 163
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 120
110% 168 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$20
466GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 118 119 119 119 118 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.2% Good
Read 109
Write 89.2
Mixed 63.5
SusWrite 118
70% 95 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 69%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB
3TB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5F0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 156 156 155 156 155 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Read 153
Write 171
Mixed 93.7
SusWrite 156
105% 143 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.7
154% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 89%
USB DISK 3.0 64GB
34GB free, PID 6300
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 113
Mixed 6.7
43% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.2
35% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 35%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.8% Below average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 7.6
MC Mixed 13.1
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.6
SC Write 7.3
SC Mixed 9.4
23% 8.1 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A88X+ Killer Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A88X+ Killer - $150

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Average Total price: $434
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback