Today's hottest deals

Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics6.98% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 06 '22 at 12:24
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 34%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G3900-$49
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
60% Above average
Memory 90.9
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 169
69% 116 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 174
23% 172 Pts
64-Core 176
11% 176 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Asus(1043 8345) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.74
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
6.98% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 11.7
Parallax 3.6
8% 8.33 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 7.6
Splatting 4.2
5% 6.67 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.98%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G2 120GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 71 71 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 490
Write 311
Mixed 303
SusWrite 88.1
66% 298 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 91.8
4K Mixed 26.8
137% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 132
DQ Write 216
DQ Mixed 34.5
66% 128 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
398GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 77 77 78 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 133
Write 134
Mixed 68
SusWrite 76.2
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-057.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 15
MC Mixed 11.9
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 12.8
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,256 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback