Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF  (all builds)
Memory1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 16 '21 at 16:59
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4400-$95
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
44.2% Average
Memory 52.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 204
64% 120 Pts
4-Core 211
8-Core 208
28% 210 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
Gigabyte(1458 36AC) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.5
Reflection 47.6
Parallax 42.1
37% 45.1 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 37.3
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$35
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3401103
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 26 197 395 367 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 310
Write 30
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 191
32% 147 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 7.7
36% 10.4 MB/s
DQ Read 135
DQ Write 31.4
DQ Mixed 38.9
40% 68.3 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-057.A00G 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.1% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 10.6
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.77 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 781 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $431
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback