Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130618
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '21 at 11:13
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4300-$52
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Memory 79.1
1-Core 66.7
2-Core 119
55% 88.2 Pts
4-Core 204
8-Core 201
27% 203 Pts
64-Core 209
13% 209 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 6870
XFX(1682 3103) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
15.5% Very poor
Lighting 21.7
Reflection 21.3
Parallax 19.2
18% 20.7 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 11.8
11% 14 fps
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.5%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSDPR-CL100-120-G2 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V4.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 379 382 390 388 387 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 429
Write 361
Mixed 314
SusWrite 374
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 29.9
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 19.8
98% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 37.2
71% 141 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 78%
WD WD8000AARS-00Y5B1 800GB
672GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 87 87 89 89 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
49.7% Average
Read 85.5
Write 83
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 87.6
58% 79.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
42.5% Average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 8.7
MC Mixed 15.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 12.8
30% 10.5 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $395
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback