Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 33% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Hp-pavilion VD054AA-AB9 p6110pt (all builds)
Motherboard	PEGATRON Benicia
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Aug 11 '22 at 10:50
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	PRT-User
Background CPU	49%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium E6300-$66 2,604 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	Memory 48.3 1-Core 41.2 2-Core 73.4 34% 54.3 Pts	4-Core 72.8 8-Core 73.7 10% 73.2 Pts	64-Core 72.8 4% 72.8 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% XFX(1682 3203) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 2 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.87 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 2 Splatting 2 2% 1.83 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1D1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 166 160 178 203 186 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.9% Average	Read 150 Write 105 Mixed 187 SusWrite 178 35% 155 MB/s	4K Read 14 4K Write 34.4 4K Mixed 23.2 69% 23.9 MB/s	DQ Read 175 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 140 110% 153 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.3 MC Write 4 MC Mixed 4.2 13% 4.5 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.3 12% 4.1 GB/s	Latency 167 24% 167 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 45%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM