Today's hottest deals

HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive76.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Laptop 17-ca0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84D0
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210331
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateMay 17 '22 at 18:45
Run Duration173 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
40.3% Average
Memory 63.9
1-Core 70.5
2-Core 99
48% 77.8 Pts
4-Core 99.9
8-Core 98.5
13% 99.2 Pts
64-Core 99.4
6% 99.4 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 84D0) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.09.04.02
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
3.39% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.8
3% 5 fps
MRender 3.1
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.39%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR1ZABHA 256GB
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 392 276 150 155 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Read 433
Write 440
Mixed 370
SusWrite 251
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 33
112% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 186
141% 191 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MK5076GSX 500GB-$54
318GB free
Firmware: GS001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 72 72 72 71 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 69.3
Write 60.2
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 71.3
40% 54.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 40.4%
Great: 42%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
23.4% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 7.3
22% 7.77 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.5
20% 7 GB/s
Latency 117
34% 117 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 17-ca0xxx Builds (Compare 197 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 17-ca0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback