Today's hottest deals

MSI P67A-GD53 (MS-7681)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics61.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMSI MS-7681
MotherboardMSI P67A-GD53 (MS-7681)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130109
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 03 '22 at 18:24
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 93
2-Core 184
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 269
8-Core 307
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 324
20% 324 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.15
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
61.5% Good
Lighting 80.2
Reflection 78.4
Parallax 76.6
65% 78.4 fps
MRender 64.6
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 60.3
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 266 255 246 252 245 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Read 456
Write 392
Mixed 342
SusWrite 251
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 27.7
4K Mixed 24.5
93% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 79.8
DQ Mixed 176
144% 214 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 124%
WD WD1500ADFD-00NLR1 150GB
122GB free
Firmware: 21.07QR4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 82 82 74 83 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
42.9% Average
Read 69.4
Write 74.5
Mixed 41
SusWrite 79.4
48% 66.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
68.4% Good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 25.5
MC Mixed 23
70% 24.4 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 17.7
SC Mixed 19.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P67A-GD53 (MS-7681) Builds (Compare 149 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: MSI P67A-GD53 (MS-7681)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $546
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback