Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 26 '22 at 20:04
Run Duration210 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$83
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
67.5% Good
Memory 53.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 183
65% 118 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 361
60% 426 Pts
64-Core 462
29% 462 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 67.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
Nvidia(10DE 1D01) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17.5
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 18.6
14% 18.1 fps
MRender 15.9
Gravity 19.2
Splatting 16.9
14% 17.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte SSD 120GB-$40
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 443
Write 359
Mixed 323
83% 375 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 76.2
4K Mixed 32.4
128% 46.4 MB/s
DQ Read 244
DQ Write 73.9
DQ Mixed 18.7
50% 112 MB/s
Poor: 38% Great: 86%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$35
303GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 124 114 134 120 124 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 25.2
Write 112
Mixed 26.4
SusWrite 122
52% 71.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFS8266.M8FD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
33.5% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 12.6
MC Mixed 10.2
34% 12.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 10.1
SC Mixed 7.7
26% 9.03 GB/s
Latency 149
27% 149 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M S2V 2.0 Builds (Compare 690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $347
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $82
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback