Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	15.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	18.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (57%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A8-7670K APU (2014 D.Ka) 1,733 User benchmarks, average bench 47% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	36.2% Below average	Memory 65.6 1-Core 56.6 2-Core 78.3 44% 66.8 Pts	4-Core 39.2 8-Core 91.2 8% 65.2 Pts	64-Core 123 8% 123 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 36.2% Great: 55%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Asus(1043 85F5) 2GB CLim: 2113 MHz, MLim: 1844 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 511.79 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Lighting 19.1 Reflection 24.8 Parallax 20.6 16% 21.5 fps	MRender 20.2 Gravity 21 Splatting 18.8 16% 20 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 15%
AMD Radeon R7 Graphics 22,117 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 85CB) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 21.5.2 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	4.97% Terrible	Lighting 5.4 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 7.7 4% 7.77 fps	MRender 6.8 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 9.5 6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.97% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingmax 120GB 120GB 2,908 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 77 71 52 65 48 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	18.5% Very poor	Read 102 Write 81.5 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 69.7 18% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 9.3 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 8.1 31% 10.1 MB/s	DQ Read 11.8 DQ Write 16.5 DQ Mixed 13.4 10% 13.9 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 86%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100 67,541 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 58GB free Firmware: M0CR031 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 292 262 276 147 152 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 263 Write 313 Mixed 262 SusWrite 234 61% 268 MB/s	4K Read 14.4 4K Write 23.2 4K Mixed 21.7 62% 19.8 MB/s	DQ Read 23 DQ Write 65.9 DQ Mixed 32.5 28% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 95%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 76 70 56 66 49 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Read 151 Write 131 Mixed 43.7 SusWrite 67.6 72% 98.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CT102464BD160B.M16 PSD38G16002 16GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 7.1 MC Mixed 9.8 18% 6.47 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 3.8 SC Mixed 7.3 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 112 36% 112 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

CPU
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples	36x
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	33x
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples	19x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	23x
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples	19x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $90Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	13x
HyperX 3K 120GBKingston $100Bench 74%, 46,066 samples	9x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	8x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	12x
KHX1866C10D3/4G 8GBKingstonBench 40%, 751 samples	6x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	4x

Value: 26% - Poor

Total price: $90

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16