Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive43.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190813
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '22 at 15:00
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MOZ-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.3% Good
Memory 62.2
1-Core 109
2-Core 196
68% 122 Pts
4-Core 389
8-Core 286
48% 337 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 86%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF510000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 3.6 4.6 4.6 3.5 6.6 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
43.8% Average
Read 420
Write 333
Mixed 288
SusWrite 32.9
60% 269 MB/s
4K Read 16.1
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 19.1
67% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 115
DQ Write 68.5
DQ Mixed 30.8
39% 71.4 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 55%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
322GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 102 100 101 102 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
57.5% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 92.2
Mixed 65.5
SusWrite 102
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.5%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
31.2% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.6
MC Mixed 10.1
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 8.9
26% 9.13 GB/s
Latency 121
33% 121 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H310M H 2.0 Builds (Compare 3,948 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M H 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 102% - Outstanding Total price: $236
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $298WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback