Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7300HQ 170,871 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	66.9% Good	Memory 83.2 1-Core 75.2 2-Core 142 61% 100 Pts	4-Core 293 8-Core 298 39% 296 Pts	64-Core 294 18% 294 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 66.9% Great: 69%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8500G 500GB 87,883 User benchmarks, average bench 197% 76GB free Firmware: S5Z42105 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 318 104 96 207 190 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	91.9% Outstanding	Read 927 Write 988 Mixed 549 SusWrite 176 147% 660 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 36.4 113% 36.4 MB/s	DQ Read 303 DQ Write 73.6 DQ Mixed 118 105% 165 MB/s
Poor: 118% ↑ This bench: 91.9% Great: 277%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 184GB free (System drive) Firmware: LCM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 62 52 67 47 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	39.4% Below average	Read 77.6 Write 96 Mixed 56.8 SusWrite 59.5 54% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.1 74% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 39.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Ramaxel RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 859B CB8GS2400.C8D 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	72.4% Very good	MC Read 27.5 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 23.7 75% 26.4 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 24.9 SC Mixed 18.2 54% 18.9 GB/s	Latency 74.8 54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 72%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 310,249 samples	4,183x
GTX 1050 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 23%, 160,694 samples	1,750x
GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 29%, 105,856 samples	996x

SSD
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 177%, 99,566 samples	620x
MZVLW128HEGR-000L2 128GBSamsungBench 171%, 6,569 samples	428x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 128GBSamsungBench 176%, 11,069 samples	354x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	985x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	894x
RMSA3260MH78HAF-2666 2x8GBRamaxelBench 71%, 6,014 samples	586x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16