Today's hottest deals

Monster ABRA A5 V12.1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V12.1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V12.1
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170508
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 14:13
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Memory 13.3
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 175
46% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 302
39% 296 Pts
64-Core 306
19% 306 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Clevo(1558 850A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.01% Terrible
Lighting 4.2
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 4.5
3% 4 fps
MRender 5.3
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 0.1
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.01%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PDP3128B-AA1 128GB
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFK0S03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 507 350 154 146 159 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 897
Write 538
Mixed 635
SusWrite 246
129% 579 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 59.9
4K Mixed 39.9
132% 44.1 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 405
292% 376 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 108%
Great: 167%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
19.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 5.9
20% 7.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 3.6
13% 4.63 GB/s
Latency 374
11% 374 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 19.1%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V12.1 Builds (Compare 368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V12.1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 8% - Terrible Total price: $76
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback