Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160324
Uptime30.1 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 05:16
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$90
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 75.7
2-Core 124
61% 96.3 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 333
38% 294 Pts
64-Core 329
20% 329 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
PNY(196E 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.1% Average
Lighting 55.8
Reflection 66.8
Parallax 58.8
46% 60.5 fps
MRender 66.7
Gravity 59.2
Splatting 50.6
47% 58.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$77
104GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 248 267 203 206 208 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 474
Write 286
Mixed 233
SusWrite 227
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 20.9
4K Write 63.9
4K Mixed 33.4
108% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 247
DQ Write 83.5
DQ Mixed 64.7
74% 132 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 129%
WD WD15EZRX-00DC0B0 1.5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 142 144 145 141 143 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Read 154
Write 148
Mixed 83
SusWrite 143
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
203% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 83%
LaCie 2Big Quadra v3 8TB
6TB free, PID 105f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 143 138 151 134 136 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
58.1% Above average
Read 164
Write 104
Mixed 42.7
SusWrite 139
142% 112 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.4
61% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2133 C11 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
31.8% Below average
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 10
28% 9.67 GB/s
Latency 68.7
58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,492 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 82% - Excellent Total price: $249
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback