Today's hottest deals

Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory19.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131230
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateJul 16 '18 at 12:49
Run Duration195 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Memory 90
1-Core 115
2-Core 234
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 746
74% 603 Pts
64-Core 879
54% 879 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.36
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 53% Great: 66%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 456GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 238 194 44 100 184 211 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 415
Write 211
Mixed 293
SusWrite 162
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 35.4
4K Mixed 25.9
88% 28.4 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 207
175% 250 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 129%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 11.5TB
1TB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 123 56 60 43 90 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
97.7% Outstanding
Read 250
Write 246
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 87.9
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 2
552% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 128%
This bench: 97.7%
Great: 317%
LaCie 2Big Quadra v3 8TB
5TB free, PID 105f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 98 61 96 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 161
Write 142
Mixed 61
SusWrite 91.7
145% 114 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
92% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 96%
LaCie 2big v2 THB USB3 12TB
1.5TB free, PID 1077
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 233 234 139 221 220 221 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
96% Outstanding
Read 230
Write 188
Mixed 70.3
SusWrite 211
227% 175 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 3.2
299% 4.83 MB/s
LaCie 2Big Quadra v3 8TB
733GB free, PID 105f
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 60 99 99 100 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.4% Average
Read 174
Write 130
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 93
142% 114 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
62% 1.73 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM3X4GBA1600C9V4 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
83% Excellent
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 31.5
MC Mixed 29.7
91% 31.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 13.3
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 67.2
60% 67.2 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,645 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $1,154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback