Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP355E5X-A01TR
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 01 '21 at 13:57
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD E1-1200 APU
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
23.4% Poor
Memory 42.4
1-Core 12.8
2-Core 20.4
19% 25.2 Pts
4-Core 27.8
8-Core 29.4
4% 28.6 Pts
64-Core 32.9
2% 32.9 Pts
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7310
Sanyo(144D C0DB) 384MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.930.13.1300
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
0.79% Terrible
Lighting 0.9
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.37 fps
MRender 1.5
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.1 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.79%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T25 3LE120G 120GB
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 120 77 99 95 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 360
Write 243
Mixed 252
SusWrite 100
53% 239 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 18.1
4K Mixed 13.2
45% 14.5 MB/s
DQ Read 95.7
DQ Write 81.5
DQ Mixed 41.8
44% 73 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773EB0-CK0 Hynix HMT125S6BFR8C-H9 4GB
800, 667 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.8
MC Write 3.3
MC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.5
SC Write 1.6
SC Mixed 1
4% 1.37 GB/s
Latency 191
21% 191 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 11%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3 Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 355V4C/355V4X/355V5C/355V5X/356V4C/356V4X/356V5C/356V5X/3445VC/3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback