MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7721
MotherboardMSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160810
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 20 '19 at 15:07
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A6-7400K APU (2014 D.Ka)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
43.7% Average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 99.8
50% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 99.9
8-Core 97.7
13% 98.8 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 45%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
MSI(1462 7721) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 14.502.1020.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
4.57% Terrible
Lighting 5.23
Reflection 7.88
Parallax 6.41
4% 6.51 fps
MRender 5.38
Gravity 5.13
Splatting 7.74
5% 6.08 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.57%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Team T25 3LE120G 120GB
80GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 314 67 61 63 63 63 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.6% Very good
Read 416
Write 286
Mixed 290
SusWrite 105
61% 274 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 29.9
129% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 220
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 161
137% 200 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 72%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 8GB
4GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
0.28% Terrible
Read 0.5
Write 0.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 0.5
1% 0.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
2% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 0.28%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
29% Poor
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 7.4
MC Mixed 11.2
28% 9.77 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.8
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 29%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721) Builds (Compare 1,084 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI A68HM-E33 V2 (MS-7721)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $63
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback