PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell OptiPlex 7010 |
Motherboard | Dell OptiPlex 7010 (all builds) |
Memory | 1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180222 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 21 '21 at 04:24 |
Run Duration | 239 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 68% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3475S
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SSD 240GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMKB.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 367 251 21 18 20 MB/s
|
58.4%
Above average
|
|||
WD WD1600JD-22HBB0 160GB
105GB free
Firmware: 09.05M09
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.1 5.2 11 12 12 MB/s
|
4.23%
Terrible
|
|||
Seagate ST3160318AS 160GB-$43
149GB free
Firmware: HP34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 103 104 104 105 105 MB/s
|
59.8%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
51.4%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 3,923x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 3,543x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 1,609x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 2,190x |
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples | 984x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 933x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $87 |