Today's hottest deals

Lenovo 3228A1G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemLenovo 3228A1G  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 20 '20 at 16:26
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 106
2-Core 211
76% 134 Pts
4-Core 349
8-Core 518
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 520
32% 520 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 74%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Asus(1043 858B) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Lighting 6.1
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 7.9
5% 6.2 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 7.3
Splatting 7.2
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
299GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 443 451 432 338 382 381 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 434
Mixed 409
SusWrite 405
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 36.3
117% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 363
274% 367 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$22
289GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 104 102 104 104 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 108
Write 100
Mixed 61.9
SusWrite 103
68% 93.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
30.9% Below average
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.8
27% 9.6 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 10.3
31% 11 GB/s
Latency 74.5
54% 74.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 3228A1G Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3228A1G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback