Today's hottest deals

Asus X99-S

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus X99-S  (all builds)
Memory40.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190710
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateSep 18 '21 at 18:46
Run Duration249 Seconds
Run User PSE-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
45.8% Average
Memory 42.1
1-Core 75.5
2-Core 145
48% 87.4 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 509
46% 387 Pts
64-Core 849
52% 849 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$270
Sapphire(1DA2 E448) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 106
Reflection 136
Parallax 223
87% 155 fps
MRender 215
Gravity 113
Splatting 149
128% 159 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 192 170 171 180 187 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
64.8% Good
Read 334
Write 331
Mixed 275
SusWrite 190
64% 283 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 39.4
4K Mixed 24.4
87% 29 MB/s
DQ Read 312
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 309
226% 297 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 124%
Seagate FireCuda 120 SSD ZA1000GM10001 1TB
826GB free
Firmware: SU3SC013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 96 85 100 136 148 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.4% Very poor
Read 68.5
Write 54.9
Mixed 51.1
SusWrite 108
16% 70.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 2.2
7% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 136%
Seagate FireCuda 120 SSD ZA1000GM10001 1TB
865GB free
Firmware: SU3SC013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 27 27 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
3.86% Terrible
Read 47.5
Write 52.1
Mixed 122
SusWrite 25.3
14% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
1% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 3.86%
Great: 136%
WD WD140EFFX-68VBXN0 14TB
65GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 97 95 99 93 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 125
Write 138
Mixed 99.6
SusWrite 95.1
85% 115 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 2.8
516% 3.17 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 116%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$85
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 141 145 148 146 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
86.1% Excellent
Read 155
Write 154
Mixed 96.7
SusWrite 144
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
220% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.1%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$85
2TB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 133 132 130 132 133 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 127
Write 128
Mixed 62.1
SusWrite 130
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 75%
WD My Book Duo 25F6 16TB
9.5TB free, PID 25f6
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 190 180 186 191 197 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 291
Write 226
Mixed 194
SusWrite 188
292% 225 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 1.7
262% 6.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 100%
Great: 136%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x16GB
4 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
82.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.1
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 30.9
95% 33.2 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 13.7
SC Mixed 15.2
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 193
21% 193 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.5%
Great: 140%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 22: 2R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
22% 17% 47 101 4 144 24.1" 1920 1080 SAM0E43 C24FG7x
Typical X99-S Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus X99-S

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $551
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback