Intel X99H

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics93.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemIntel X99
MotherboardIntel X99H  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230509
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 21:44
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 65.5
1-Core 78.3
2-Core 147
56% 97 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 562
50% 423 Pts
64-Core 1,143
71% 1,143 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
Nvidia(10DE 13A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.8% Outstanding
Lighting 112
Reflection 103
Parallax 118
91% 111 fps
MRender 174
Gravity 106
Splatting 97
99% 126 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ne-1tb 2280 1TB
404GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0926A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,627
Write 1,079
Mixed 1,084
280% 1,263 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 23
119% 43.2 MB/s
DQ Read 524
DQ Write 430
DQ Mixed 398
320% 451 MB/s
Poor: 92% Great: 281%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
229GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 308
Write 11.4
Mixed 9.7
79% 110 MB/s
4K Read 5.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
307% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
136GB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 102
Write 102
Mixed 66.5
67% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 77%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB
383GB free
Firmware: A6C0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 101
Write 82.2
Mixed 35.7
54% 72.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SKIHOTAR-16GB-3200 2x16GB
2 of 24 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
56.8% Above average
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 19.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 14.6
SC Mixed 15.6
39% 13.6 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 59 60 31.5" 1280 720 AOC0000 AOC LCD
Typical X99H Builds (Compare 1,157 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Intel X99H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 22% - Poor Total price: $28
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback