Supermicro X10SRA-F

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemSupermicro X10SRA-F  (all builds)
MotherboardSupermicro X10SRA-F
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateAug 25 '21 at 01:43
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2640 v4
CPU1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.1% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 101
2-Core 193
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 355
8-Core 682
62% 518 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1015 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.9% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 68.5
Parallax 80.2
48% 69.2 fps
MRender 59.5
Gravity 55.5
Splatting 42.3
42% 52.4 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 52%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
433GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 438 435 442 453 457 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 464
Write 434
Mixed 366
SusWrite 445
96% 428 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 87.2
4K Mixed 43
150% 54.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 345
261% 350 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 108%
Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9ASF51272PZ-2G1B1 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 44.5
MC Mixed 37.8
126% 44.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 17.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 35: 7R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
35% 11% 63 108 8 30 27.5" 2560 1440 SAM0B81 U28D590
Typical X10SRA-F Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

System: Supermicro X10SRA-F

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback