TEST
YOUR CPU
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Intel

Xeon E5-1650 v4

▲ 5156 ▼

6 Cores, 12 Threads @3.60 GHz, Broadwell.
Release date ≈ Q2 2016.

Average Bench: 83.5% (207th of 1459)

Based on 3,842 user benchmarks.  Devices: BFEBFBFF000406F1, , 1FABFBFF000406F1, 0000000000000000 Model: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-1650 v4 @ 3.60GHz
Poor: 75%Average: 83.5% Great: 90%
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Popular builds with this CPU

Very good average bench

The Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 averaged just 16.5% lower than the peak scores attained by the group leaders. This is an excellent result which ranks the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 near the top of the comparison list.

Strengths

Avg. Memory Latency 85Pts
Avg. Quad Core Speed 441Pts

Very good consistency

The range of scores (95th - 5th percentile) for the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 is just 15%. This is a relatively narrow range which indicates that the Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 performs reasonably consistently under varying real world conditions.

Weaknesses

Avg. Multi Core Speed 894Pts
Avg. Octa Core Speed 714Pts
ADVERTISEMENT

Average Bench

(Based on 3,842 samples)
Rank 20783.5%
Min Avg Max
76.3 Memory 85 92
90.2 1-Core 114 124
191 2-Core 228 247
80.1% 142 Pts
Min Avg Max
370 4-Core 441 487
606 8-Core 714 786
70.8% 578 Pts
Min Avg Max
703 64-Core 894 960
55.3% 894 Pts
User Benchmarks BenchNormalHeavyServer
The fastest CPU (mainstream) averages a speed of 100%
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 238
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 783
76% 626 Pts
64-Core 935
58% 935 Pts
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
89.6% Excellent
Memory 91.4
1-Core 116
2-Core 235
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 472
8-Core 760
76% 616 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 118
2-Core 232
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 474
8-Core 784
77% 629 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 83.8
1-Core 109
2-Core 217
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 764
75% 613 Pts
64-Core 927
57% 927 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 86.2
1-Core 117
2-Core 229
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 726
69% 572 Pts
64-Core 918
57% 918 Pts
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 86.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 230
82% 145 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 594
62% 498 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
78% Very good
Memory 80.8
1-Core 115
2-Core 226
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 668
66% 536 Pts
64-Core 920
57% 920 Pts
SOCKET 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
55.3% Above average
Memory 75.1
1-Core 106
2-Core 193
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 216
28% 212 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
3,842 MORE »

 Market Share (See Leaders)

The number of benchmark samples for this model as a percentage of all 68,303,153 CPUs tested

Custom PC Builder (Start a new build) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE A COMPONENT:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Xeon E5-1650 v4 Builds (Compare 6,161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: HP Z440 Workstation

CPU
Xeon E5-1650 v4IntelBench 83%, 3,842 samples1,068x
GPU
Quadro K2200Nvidia  $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples761x
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples384x
Quadro K4200Nvidia  $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples226x
SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples148x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples132x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples122x
RAM
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 2x8GBSamsungBench 60%, 1,030 samples188x
M393A1G40DB0-CPB 4x8GBSamsungBench 93%, 970 samples182x
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples162x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $440

Popular Xeon E5-1650 v4 systems:

How Fast Is Your CPU? (Bench your build) Size up your PC in less than a minute

Welcome to our PC speed test tool. UserBenchmark will test your PC and compare the results to other users with the same components. You can quickly size up your PC, identify hardware problems and explore the best value for money upgrades.

UserBenchmark of the month

Gaming Desktop ProGaming

How it works

  • - Download and run UserBenchmark
  • - CPU tests include: integer, floating and string
  • - GPU tests include: six 3D game simulations
  • - Drive tests include: read, write, sustained write and mixed IO
  • - RAM tests include: single/multi core bandwidth and latency
  • - SkillBench (space shooter) tests user input accuracy
  • - Reports are generated and presented on userbenchmark.com
  • - Identify the strongest components in your PC
  • - See speed test results from other users
  • - Compare your components to the current market leaders
  • - Explore your best upgrade options with a virtual PC build
  • - Compare your in-game FPS to other users with your hardware
Processor Rankings (Price vs Performance) July 2024 CPU Rankings

We calculate effective speed which measures real world performance for typical users. Effective speed is adjusted by current prices to yield a value for money rating. Our calculated values are checked against thousands of individual user ratings. The customizable table below combines these factors to bring you the definitive list of top CPUs. [CPUPro]

ADVERTISEMENT

Group Test Results

  • Best user rated - User sentiment trumps benchmarks for this comparison.
  • Best value for money - Value for money is based on real world performance.
  • Fastest real world speed - Real World Speed measures performance for typical consumers.

 Specifications

Essentials

DescriptionIntel® Xeon® Processor E5-1650 v4 (15M Cache, 3.60 GHz)
Code NameBroadwell
Launch DateQ2'16
Processor NumberE5-1650V4
# of Cores6
# of Threads12
Cache15 MB
Instruction Set64-bit
Instruction Set ExtensionsAVX 2.0
Embedded Options AvailableNo
Lithography14 nm
Recommended Price$617.00 - $621.00
Clock Speed3.60 GHz
Max Turbo Frequency4.00 GHz
Bus Speed0 GT/s QPI
QPI Links0
Scalability1S Only
Max TDP140 W

Graphics

Processor GraphicsNone

Memory

Max Memory Size1.54 TB
Memory TypesDDR4 1600/1866/2133/2400
Memory Channels4
Memory Bandwidth76.8 GB/s
Physical Address Extensions46-bit
ECC Memory SupportedYes

Expansion Options

PCI Express Revision3.0
PCI Express Configurationsx4, x8, x16
Max # of PCI Express Lanes40

Data Protection

AES New InstructionsYes
Secure KeyYes

Advanced Technologies

Turbo Boost 3.0 TechYes
Virtualization Tech (VT-x)Yes
Intel 64Yes
Idle StatesYes
Enhanced Intel SpeedStep® TechYes
Thermal Monitoring TechnologiesYes
Turbo Boost Tech2.0
Hyper-Threading TechYes
Virtualization for Directed I/O (VT-d)Yes
VT-x with Extended Page Tables (EPT)Yes
TSX-NIYes
Demand Based SwitchingYes
vPro TechYes
Identity Protection TechYes
Flex Memory AccessNo

Package

Package Size45mm x 52.5mm
Max CPU Configuration1
Sockets SupportedFCLGA2011-3

Platform Protection

Execute Disable BitYes
OS GuardYes
Trusted Execution TechYes

 Comments

Added n/a ago.
USA-User
Avatar level
9,918

Disliked (edit your comment) Add link

3 months ago.

NLD-User
Avatar level
3,548

Excellent

7 months ago.

Still holds up with the rest, no lags, super consistent

FV101
Avatar level
8

Excellent

10 months ago.

Amazing Value chip, close to a 2600 non x.

Your
opinion?
▲Like ▼Dislike
Ready to retire
Age: 8 years

Speed Comparisons

vs Intel Core i5-12600K
vs Intel Core i5-12400F
vs Intel Core i5-13600K
vs Intel Core i7-14700K
vs AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
vs Intel Core i3-13100F
vs Intel Core i7-13700K
vs Intel Core i5-12400
vs AMD Ryzen 5 3600

1459 Processors (Compared) Thousands of user benchmarks compiled into one comparison list

See how consistently different CPUs perform with varying real world conditions. The charts also illustrate overall performance, popularity and rank.

 Frequently Asked Questions

Processors FAQ
AMD vs Intel: Gaming performance 2012-2021
How does IPC compare between AMD's Ryzen and Intel's Kaby Lake?
What is multi core mixed speed?
What is multi core integer speed?
What is multi core floating point speed?
What is single core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core mixed CPU speed?
What is quad core floating point speed?
What is quad core integer speed?
What is single core floating point speed?
What is single core integer speed?
What is the GeekBench single core score?
What is a CPU?
What is the effective CPU speed index?
What is overclocking?
What is thermal design power (TDP)?
ALL FAQs »

 Best User Rated
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $205Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback