Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 117%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 14 '21 at 16:33
Run Duration298 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$285
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
98.2% Outstanding
Memory 86
1-Core 149
2-Core 298
96% 178 Pts
4-Core 591
8-Core 1,079
100% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,008
62% 1,008 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 98.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 192
Parallax 161
133% 172 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 169
Splatting 104
109% 137 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,344
Write 1,088
Mixed 1318
348% 1,583 MB/s
4K Read 60.7
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 79.4
263% 90.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,014
DQ Write 1,217
DQ Mixed 1,172
868% 1,134 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
114GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 419 446 448 430 432 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 448
Mixed 392
SusWrite 411
98% 437 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 54.7
183% 64.1 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 353
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 118%
Great: 134%
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160
21GB free
Firmware: 603ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 68 76 76 87 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.9% Above average
Read 218
Write 126
Mixed 154
SusWrite 72
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 30.8
120% 47.1 MB/s
DQ Read 94.1
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 96
76% 106 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 75%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
269GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 159 160 160 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 132
Write 150
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 160
94% 129 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 112%
WD WD20EFAX-68FB5N0 2TB
585GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 128 130 128 130 130 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 28% Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
67.8% Good
MC Read 23.9
MC Write 26.4
MC Mixed 21.1
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 27.2
SC Mixed 20.7
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 71.2
56% 71.2 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 67: 8R 9G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
67% 55% 31 288 202 60 24.1" 1920 1080 ACI23C2 ASUS MX239
History: Score 31: 4R 2G 5B | Score 63: 7R 7G 7B | Score 67: 8R 9G 0B
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING Builds (Compare 13,410 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 115%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-F GAMING - $309

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 106% - Outstanding Total price: $1,082
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback