Today's hottest deals

Asus H81M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics72.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive14.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-C  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130827
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 23 '23 at 06:46
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 62%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4765T
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 86.3
1-Core 70.6
2-Core 139
60% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 224
8-Core 341
35% 283 Pts
64-Core 340
21% 340 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$236
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.79
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.7% Very good
Lighting 90.8
Reflection 88.9
Parallax 78.4
74% 86 fps
MRender 110
Gravity 81.4
Splatting 73
70% 88 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650 480GB-$89
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1207A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 11 41 25 23 40 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
14.8% Very poor
Read 52.2
Write 170
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 30.8
15% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 8.4
4K Mixed 1
19% 6.1 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 1
35% 84.9 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 99%
WD WD20EFAX-68FB5N0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 172 178 181 179 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 160
Mixed 60.5
SusWrite 170
104% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
57.8% Above average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 18.7
59% 20.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 17.4
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,131 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $305
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback