Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 R5

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	48.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 R5 (all builds)
Memory	2.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150401
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 29 '17 at 14:42
Run Duration	191 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	33%

PC Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-6100-$68 44,863 User benchmarks, average bench 54% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	53.3% Above average	Memory 75.7 1-Core 54.2 2-Core 100 49% 76.7 Pts	4-Core 173 8-Core 227 26% 200 Pts	64-Core 239 15% 239 Pts
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199 18,014 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Sapphire(174B E331) CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.1% Average	Lighting 53 Reflection 25.1 Parallax 108 43% 62.1 fps	MRender 57.6 Gravity 77.9 Splatting 73.6 58% 69.7 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$90 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 368GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3259 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 529 (B1) Unknown 99 99 6 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 51 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 50 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8458639707	68.5% Good	Read 486 Write 375 Mixed 400 94% 421 MB/s	4K Read 25.7 4K Write 36.3 4K Mixed 16.7 80% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 40.4 DQ Write 66.7 DQ Mixed 30.9 30% 46 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 134%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$58 253,816 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 1TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 169 166 4533 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 537 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3263 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 535 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 66 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 174 174 79040 (C2) HDA temperature 119 99 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	70.3% Very good	Read 137 Write 108 Mixed 117 91% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 2.27 4K Mixed 0.18 97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 84%
WL1000GSA6454G 1TB 428 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 718GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 12 (03) Spinup time 111 108 7433 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2553 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 77 77 17465 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2534 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 230 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 131 131 207558 (C2) HDA temperature 120 90 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	59.1% Above average	Read 109 Write 97 Mixed 93.6 75% 99.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.15 65% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 59.1% Great: 85%
TrekStor DS maxi m.ub 500GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 90GB free, PID 0c15 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Read 30.2 Write 29 Mixed 19 32% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.25 62% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial ST51264BA1339 2x4GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.1% Poor	MC Read 8.6 MC Write 8.7 MC Mixed 7.7 24% 8.33 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 6 17% 6.1 GB/s	Latency 88.9 45% 88.9 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-990FXA-UD5 R5 Builds (Compare 46 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5 R5

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	15x
FX-9590AMD $298Bench 63%, 26,109 samples	10x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
BX200 240GBCrucial $36Bench 76%, 36,559 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 46%, 10,715 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 52%, 1,736 samples	2x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 60%, 1,520 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 47% - Average

Total price: $468

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $250	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16