Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive220% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201022
Uptime24.1 Days
Run DateNov 07 '21 at 15:17
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Memory 73.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 298
93% 174 Pts
4-Core 566
8-Core 990
94% 778 Pts
64-Core 1,452
90% 1,452 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 496.49
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 36.2
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 38.1
30% 38.4 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 38.1
Splatting 27.2
28% 34.5 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M81000G 1TB
629GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1247 1511 748 826 557 476 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
220% Outstanding
Read 1,790
Write 1,663
Mixed 1,325
SusWrite 894
318% 1418 MB/s
4K Read 57.5
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 67.5
222% 72.3 MB/s
DQ Read 729
DQ Write 352
DQ Mixed 436
351% 506 MB/s
Poor: 140%
This bench: 220%
Great: 311%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
61GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 378 319 320 320 320 321 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 512
Write 490
Mixed 464
SusWrite 330
101% 449 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 94.7
4K Mixed 54.6
183% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 361
DQ Mixed 370
279% 373 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
951GB free
Firmware: CC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 117 156 129 136 139 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
73.6% Very good
Read 122
Write 177
Mixed 73.3
SusWrite 134
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
175GB free
Firmware: KC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 98 102 100 101 101 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 95.8
Write 95.8
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 99.9
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
131% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 88%
TrekStor DS maxi m.ub 500GB
136GB free, PID 0c15
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.6 8 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.2 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.06% Terrible
Read 30.7
Write 30.1
Mixed 27.4
SusWrite 7.9
31% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.06%
Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BL8G32C16U4B.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.2% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 27.8
74% 25.7 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 27.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
Latency 92.8
43% 92.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,986 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $749
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback