Today's hottest deals

Asrock G41C-GS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics7.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsrock G41C-GS  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131206
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateJul 28 '17 at 18:07
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
44.7% Average
Memory 71.3
1-Core 27.2
2-Core 54.6
36% 51 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 102
14% 106 Pts
64-Core 110
7% 110 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.94
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Lighting 7.97
Reflection 7.5
Parallax 8.59
6% 8.02 fps
MRender 8.62
Gravity 10.2
Splatting 10.6
8% 9.81 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD1600BB-22GUC0 160GB
298GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 71.1
Write 71.7
Mixed 58.7
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.06
4K Mixed 0.59
152% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 32%
Seagate ST3160815A 160GB-$70
298GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 69.9
Write 70.8
Mixed 36
44% 58.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.96
4K Mixed 0.55
144% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$46
85GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 76
Write 79.3
Mixed 74
58% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.28
4K Mixed 0.29
95% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 69%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100
42GB free
Firmware: 2AC101C4 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 50.1
Write 53.3
Mixed 36.1
35% 46.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.37
89% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 47%
Seagate ST9160314AS 160GB
43GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 56.8
Write 54.4
Mixed 25.6
34% 45.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.32
4K Write 0.89
4K Mixed 0.29
62% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
16% Very poor
MC Read 6.2
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 4.3
14% 4.93 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 4.4
SC Mixed 4.4
11% 3.8 GB/s
Latency 98.5
41% 98.5 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 16%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical G41C-GS Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock G41C-GS - $57

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $132
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback