Today's hottest deals

Asus M4A78T-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive59.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus M4A78T-E  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110413
Uptime13.2 Days
Run DateMar 05 '19 at 02:18
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
36.1% Below average
Memory 58.9
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 57.7
32% 48.1 Pts
4-Core 79.4
8-Core 83.4
11% 81.4 Pts
64-Core 87.4
5% 87.4 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 36.1%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
EVGA(3842 1151) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
8.4% Terrible
Lighting 11.4
Reflection 10.5
Parallax 3.72
9% 8.54 fps
MRender 9.19
Gravity 8.57
Splatting 6.96
7% 8.24 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.4%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
164GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 171 170 173 175 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.3% Above average
Read 236
Write 211
Mixed 201
SusWrite 173
46% 205 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 46.4
4K Mixed 31.9
107% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 128
DQ Mixed 136
102% 136 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 124%
WD WD1600BB-22GUC0 160GB
103GB free
Firmware: 08.02D08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 56 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
32% Below average
Read 55.5
Write 53.7
Mixed 29.2
SusWrite 55.4
36% 48.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
149% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 32%
Great: 32%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$33
892GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 172 175 175 181 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 168
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 174
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.2
219% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 109%
Seagate FreeAgent GoFlex 1TB
804GB free, PID 5031
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
9.34% Terrible
Read 21
Write 23.2
Mixed 14.2
SusWrite 22.7
28% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 9.34%
Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
19.5% Very poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 7.5
19% 6.5 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 4.7
SC Mixed 5.9
15% 5.33 GB/s
Latency 131
30% 131 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4A78T-E Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A78T-E - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback